Programme Duration
6 Months
Evidence Level
L3 and L4
Outcome Tracking Window
12 Months
Cohort Cycles
3 Waves
Cohort
Senior women leaders at manager to director level
Scale
Multi-city, 3 cohort waves
Methodology
Women emPower, ExperienceLearning, Individual Coaching
Duration
6 months
The problem before ProventusHR
The organisation had run women-focused development programmes before. The consistent feedback from participants was that the programmes were affirming and well-designed but did not change anything that mattered. The participants returned to workplaces that had not changed. Their managers, predominantly men, had not been part of the programme and had no context for what their direct reports had experienced. Sponsorship was informal, dependent on individual relationships, and overwhelmingly concentrated among men who sponsored people who reminded them of themselves. The pipeline issue was not a pipeline issue. It was a systemic issue operating just below the level that was visible in aggregate data.
What the diagnostic surfaced
ProventusHR conducted discovery interviews with twenty-two women at manager and senior manager level, and separately with fifteen of their reporting managers, the majority of whom were men. The two sets of conversations produced strikingly different accounts of the same situations. Women described being interrupted in meetings, having their ideas attributed to others, being given feedback on their style in ways that their male peers were not, and being sponsored in ways that were affirmative but not commercially consequential. The managers described their direct reports as strong but perhaps not yet ready, not quite visible enough, and not proactive enough in positioning themselves. The gap between these accounts was the design brief.
Women emPower was designed as a six-month journey with three distinct elements. The core programme, delivered across four workshops, built four capability areas: owning and articulating strategic contribution, navigating the specific organisational dynamics that suppress women leaders, building and activating a sponsor network, and designing a visible leadership presence that was authentic rather than performative. Alongside the workshops, each participant was paired with a senior sponsor from the organisation who had been specifically briefed on what sponsorship means in operational terms: not mentoring, not advice, but active advocacy in the rooms where decisions are made. Individual coaching of three sessions per participant anchored the behavioural changes between workshops. Critically, the organisation agreed to run a parallel module for reporting managers, a two-hour session on the specific behaviours that enable or suppress women leaders in their teams.
Three cohort waves ran across the year. The first cohort was used to validate the design and produced the insight that led to the most significant change in subsequent waves: the sponsor pairing was not working as intended because sponsors had not been given enough structure. ProventusHR redesigned the sponsor briefing into a more explicit framework and introduced a monthly sponsor-participant check-in agenda. The second and third waves showed materially stronger outcomes on the sponsorship dimension. Several participants in the second cohort documented promotions or significant scope expansions during the programme period and attributed them specifically to sponsor advocacy.
At six-month and twelve-month follow-up, outcome tracking showed measurable movement on three dimensions: promotion rates within the twelve months following programme completion were higher for programme participants than for a matched control group of women at the same level who had not participated; self-rated confidence in articulating strategic contribution increased significantly from pre to post programme; and manager-rated leadership visibility increased for seventy percent of participants. Four participants were promoted into director roles within twelve months of the programme. Two attributed the promotion in their own written accounts to specific sponsor interventions that the programme had activated. A participant wrote: I have spent seven years being told I need to be more visible. Nobody told me that visibility is an organisational system, not a personal quality. This programme changed how I understand the game.
Women leadership programmes that focus on individual development without addressing the organisational system that shapes visibility, sponsorship, and opportunity do not produce sustainable results. They produce capable, frustrated people who leave. The design that works addresses the individual and the system simultaneously: building capability in the participant while changing the operating conditions that determine whether that capability is recognised and rewarded.
Engineering Consulting · Leadership Capability Development
CRAFT 1.0: building project leadership from the site up
5 months · CRAFT, ExperienceLearning, REEL|Life, Computer Simulations
Banking and Financial Services · Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging
Breaking unconscious bias across a 15,000-person BFSI institution
14 cohorts over 18 months · Unseen Verdicts, Elephant in the Room, REEL|Life
Health and Pharmaceuticals · Executive Coaching
Post-merger MD coaching: from operational control to strategic influence
9 months · Marshall Goldsmith Stakeholder Centred Coaching