FMCG and Consumer Products Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging Culture Compass, Elephant in the Room, REEL|Life

Inclusive leadership for a global FMCG, observable within 90 days

The global headquarters had commissioned an inclusion index survey. India came back as the region with the largest gap between stated inclusion values and employee-reported inclusion experience. The India HR director had known for some time that something was operating in the leadership culture that the standard inclusion training programmes had not reached. What she needed was a design rigorous enough to produce evidence, not just reflection.

Observable Window

90 Days

Evidence Level

L3 Behavioural

Evidence Method

Multi-rater

Measurement Design

Pre and Post

Cohort

Senior leaders, India operations

Scale

Global organisation, India leadership population

Methodology

Culture Compass, Elephant in the Room, REEL|Life

Duration

4 months

The Challenge

The problem before ProventusHR

The global inclusion index data was specific about the gap but not about its source. The India operations had strong representation at junior and mid level but a significant drop in reported inclusion experience among individual contributors and junior managers. The pattern was consistent across geographies within India, which indicated that it was cultural rather than local. The organisation had run global inclusion programmes. The feedback from India participants was consistent: the programmes were designed for Western cultural contexts and felt imported rather than contextualised. The specific inclusion challenges in a hierarchical Indian corporate context , the relationship between seniority and voice, the dynamics of inclusion across caste, regional, and gender lines, the specific ways bias operates in Indian calibration and promotion processes , were not being addressed.

The Discovery

What the diagnostic surfaced

ProventusHR conducted discovery with twenty senior leaders and thirty individual contributors, deliberately separated to allow honest accounts of the same dynamics. The data was precise: the most consistent inclusion-suppressing behaviours were not expressions of explicit prejudice. They were structural: meetings where only senior voices were heard, feedback that was filtered before reaching junior team members, development opportunities allocated through networks that were shaped by affinity, and a culture of calibration that rewarded certain communication styles over others. None of these behaviours were malicious. All of them were invisible to the people producing them.

The Design

How the intervention was architected

Culture Compass was used as the primary intervention: a full-day ExperienceLearning session that mapped each leader's inclusion impact through a combination of film-based reflection, structured self-assessment, and peer-witnessed commitment. The session was preceded by a structured 360-style data collection on eight observable inclusion behaviours, rated by five direct reports per participant. This pre-programme data was returned to participants in the session as the basis for their commitment architecture. Elephant in the Room followed two weeks later: a specific focus on the most prevalent bias pattern identified in the pre-programme data for this cohort, which was voice equity in team settings. The programme ran two waves of cohorts, separated by four weeks, to allow refinement based on wave-one feedback.

The Delivery

In the room

The contextualisation requirement shaped every element of the design. Film selections were drawn from the Indian experience rather than the global canon. The bias scenarios in Elephant in the Room were constructed from real situations described in the discovery interviews, anonymised but recognisable. The facilitators were specifically briefed on the cultural dynamics of hierarchy and voice in Indian corporate settings. Participants described the programme as the first inclusion intervention they had attended that felt like it had been designed for them.

The Evidence

What the data shows

90 Days Observable Window
L3 Behavioural Evidence Level
Multi-rater Evidence Method

Post-programme 360 data at 90 days showed measurable movement on six of the eight measured behaviours. The two behaviours showing the smallest gains were the ones requiring the most structural change, which was consistent with the design expectation. Multi-rater evidence at 90 days was validated by reporting managers, who confirmed specific observable incidents for 68 percent of participants. The global inclusion index, re-administered twelve months later, showed the India operations had closed the gap with the global mean by approximately 40 percent, the largest improvement of any region.

The ProventusHR Insight

Inclusion work that is globally designed and locally deployed without contextualisation does not work. Indian corporate culture has specific inclusion dynamics that are different in important ways from Western ones. A programme that addresses those dynamics specifically, and that produces observable evidence rather than stated alignment with values, will move the behaviours that move the data.

Discuss a Challenge Like This

Does this pattern exist in your organisation?

Every engagement begins with a 45-minute conversation about the real problem. Not a proposal. A conversation.

Start a Discovery Conversation
More from the Portfolio

Related Case Studies

Engineering Consulting · Leadership Capability Development

CRAFT 1.0: building project leadership from the site up

5 months · CRAFT, ExperienceLearning, REEL|Life, Computer Simulations

Banking and Financial Services · Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging

Breaking unconscious bias across a 15,000-person BFSI institution

14 cohorts over 18 months · Unseen Verdicts, Elephant in the Room, REEL|Life

Health and Pharmaceuticals · Executive Coaching

Post-merger MD coaching: from operational control to strategic influence

9 months · Marshall Goldsmith Stakeholder Centred Coaching